For further questions:<\/p>\n
ESSA requires the State Department of Education to assess student proficiency with those standards once in grades 3-5; once in grades 6-8; and once in grades 10-12. The NJSLS-Science assessments all measure student proficiency with the age-appropriate science standards.<\/p>\n
There are a number of resources available to districts that need to remediate gaps in their high school science curriculum. These include:<\/p>\n
The assessments will measure students proficiency with the using science and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts and conceptual understandings from domains of Earth and space; life science and physical science. The assessments are very close to 1\/3 Earth and space; 1\/3 life; and 1\/3 physical sciences.<\/dd>\n
Teachers are encouraged to use the following resources to unpack the depth of understanding that is expected at the ends of grade 5, 8 and 11. The following compilation documents incorporate narrative from A Framework for K-12 Science Education<\/em> (NRC, 2012); NJSLS-S; Driving Questions from the course Storyline Documents, and links for the Evidence Statements for each Performance Expectation.<\/p>\n Teachers should also review the Clarification Statements and Assessment Boundaries provided following most Performance Expectations.<\/p>\n The assessments will measure students proficiency with the using science and engineering practices, crosscutting concepts and conceptual understandings from domains of Earth and space; life science, and physical science. The assessments are very close to 1\/3 Earth and space; 1\/3 life; and 1\/3 physical sciences.<\/dd>\n The PEEC rubric is a criterion based tool and process that can be used to evaluate the curriculum materials. The following link takes the reader to the PEEC – Alignment: NGSS Publishers Criteria<\/a>.<\/dd>\n See, also, the response to question 15 for additional documents that teachers can utilize.<\/dd>\n Units need to be designed to engage all students in making sense of phenomena and\/or designing solutions to problems through student performances that integrate the three dimensions of the NJSLS-S. The following are the shifts that should be evident in a unit.<\/p>\n NGSS Appendix L: Connections to Mathematics<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n NGSS Appendix M: Connections to CCSS-Literacy in Science and Technical Subjects<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n New Jersey Student Learning Standards for Mathematics<\/a><\/p>\n New Jersey Student Learning Standards for English Language Arts (ELA)<\/a><\/dd>\n While no document is perfect, the development of the NGSS was rigorous. The National Research Council (NRC), National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) and Achieve completed a two-step process to develop the Next Generation Science Standards.<\/p>\n Step One: Getting the Science Right<\/strong> The NRC, the staff arm of the National Academy of Sciences, began by developing the Framework for K\u201312 Science Education<\/a><\/em>. The Framework was a critical first step because it is grounded in the most current research on science and science learning<\/a> and identified the science all K\u201312 students should know upon completion of high school.<\/p>\n To undertake this effort, the NRC convened a committee of 18 individuals who are nationally and internationally known in their respective fields. The committee was composed of practicing scientists, including two Nobel laureates, cognitive scientists, science education researchers, and science education standards and policy experts. In addition, the NRC used four design teams to develop the framework. These design teams, in physical science, life science, Earth\/space science and engineering, developed the framework for their respective disciplinary area. A public draft was released in July of 2010. The NRC reviewed comments and considered all feedback prior to releasing the final Framework on July 19, 2011.\u00a0Read more about the framework<\/a>.<\/p>\n Step Two: States Developing Next Generation Science Standards<\/strong> In a process managed by Achieve, states led the development of K\u201312 science standards that are rich in content and practice and arranged in a coherent manner across disciplines and grades to provide all students an internationally-benchmarked science education. The NGSS are based on the framework<\/em> and will prepare students for college and careers. The NGSS were developed collaboratively with states and other stakeholders in science, science education, higher education and industry. Additional review and guidance were provided by advisory committees composed of nationally-recognized leaders in science and science education as well as business and industry.<\/p>\n As part of the development process, the standards underwent multiple reviews from many stakeholders including two public drafts, allowing all who have a stake in science education an opportunity to inform the development of the standards. This process produced a set of high quality, college- and career-ready K\u201312 Next Generation Science Standards<\/em> ready for state adoption. The standards were published on this website after their completion in April 2013.<\/p>\n NRC Fidelity Review <\/em><\/strong>As a part of the NGSS development process, the NRC convened a fidelity review of the final draft of the NGSS, comparing the standards to the vision outlined in A Framework for K-12 Science Education<\/em>. The reviewers concluded that the NGSS are consistent with the content and structure of the Framework<\/em>.<\/p>\n More information about the review process<\/a>.<\/p>\n Click on each of the following hyperlinks to learn more about the lead state partners<\/a>, writing team<\/a>\u00a0and critical stakeholders<\/a>.<\/p>\n Throughout the development process, the Next Generation Science Standards<\/em> (NGSS) went through several rounds of review with multiple stakeholder groups. Each group received draft standards at least twice throughout the development process.<\/p>\n Administrative Code requires the State Department of Education to review the appropriate literature, solicit public input and revise academic standards \u2013 as appropriate \u2013 every five years. It is during the review and revision process that errors can be corrected.<\/dd>\n For further questions: Questions about standards, curriculum, teaching and learning, or classroom-based assessments can be directed to michael.heinz@doe.state.nj.us. Questions about statewide assessments can be directed to john.boczany@doe.state.nj.us. Question 1: Do all standards for all students need to be completed in three years? We have some students who currently use four years for this. Please advise. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":34,"featured_media":261,"parent":65,"menu_order":1,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-66","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/prism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/66","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/prism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/prism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/prism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/34"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/prism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=66"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/prism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/66\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1739,"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/prism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/66\/revisions\/1739"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/prism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/65"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/prism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/261"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.montclair.edu\/prism\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=66"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}\n
\n
\n
\n<\/strong>Birchwood Manor
\nJefferson Road, Whippany, NJ 07981
\nFebruary 28, 2018 to March 1, 2018<\/li>\n
\n<\/strong>Forsgate Country Club
\n375 Forsgate Drive, Monroe Township, NJ\u00a0 08831
\nMarch 5 to 7, 2018<\/li>\n
\n<\/strong>Sheraton Atlantic City Conference Center Hotel
\n2 Convention Blvd., Atlantic City, NJ\u00a0 08401
\nMarch 8, 2018<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"